Teaching Strategy #2
Coordinate Course Description, Syllabus and Exams
Course descriptions represent the first “teaching opportunity.” They
are more than advertisements that no one reads carefully. A thoughtful
prepared description can engage students by allowing them to visualize
the content and the methodology of the course. A clear description indicates
an instructor’s thinking process as well as intellectual guidelines.
With easy access to print or electronic course catalogues, students can
easily identify courses that fit into their curricular plan. Course descriptions
are read and should not be discounted as mere advertising.
In general, course descriptions fall into two categories: interrogatory
or declarative. Following is an example of a description that asks questions,
suggesting that the course will focus on the method of collaborative inquiry.
Interrogatory
Individual Responsibility in Organizations
This seminar examines the research on responsibility
and relates it to how we run our business, government,
educational and other institutions. What do we do that
sabotages responsibility? How can you design organizations
so that people feel responsible? Is there a relationship
between responsibility and efficiency? If so, why is
it a secret?
The next description states what the course
will contain. This straightforward approach should
leave no room for
ambiguity
Declarative
Renaissance Europe
This course will examine the cultural and intellectual
movement known as the Renaissance, from its origins in
fourteenth-century Italy to its diffusion into the rest
of Europe in the sixteenth century. We will trace the
great changes in the world of learning and letters, the
visual arts, and music, along with those taking place
in politics, economics, and social organization. We will
be reading primary sources as well as modern works.
In
developing a course description and a syllabus, it is
important to keep in mind the rationale for the
course
(including the level), the methodology
and the expected learning outcome. In other words, keep
answering the question: “Why (and how) am I telling
these people these things at this time?”
The syllabus provides a roadmap for the course. It is not only a schedule
but also a teaching philosophy and an organizational scheme. There are
many ways to organize a syllabus; among them are:
• Chronological (History of France: 1848—1948)
• Geographical (The Modern Balkans)
• Thematic (Songs, Sonatas and Symphonies)
• Functional (Quantitative Analysis of Anthropological Data)
• Theoretical (Theories of Personality)
A well-crafted syllabus demonstrates
a cohesive approach to a discipline and lays out what the students will or
should learn—expected learning
outcomes—and how the material will be presented--methodology.
The syllabus should also include clear assignments, policies on grading
and participation and deadlines. Clarity will protect both the student
and the instructor from the negative effects of ambiguity. Some instructors
put their teaching philosophy within the syllabus so that the students
will understand both why and how the course will be taught.
Although many instructors do not create exams before the semester begins
in order to take advantage of key issues that develop during the course,
it is helpful to develop questions that are clearly related to the syllabus.
Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Outcomes suggests questions
that enable students to demonstrate their understanding of the course
material. Bloom’s taxonomy consists of six categories:
• Knowledge (Define, describe, identify, etc.)
)
• Comprehension (Convert, explain, summarize, etc.)
• Application (Demonstrate, predict, use, etc.)
• Analysis (Diagram, differentiate, identify, etc.)
• Synthesis (Combine, rearrange, plan, etc.)
• Evaluation (Appraise, justify, support, etc.)
If the course description, syllabus and exams (and other assignments)
are coordinated, the task of learning becomes easier for
students because they do not have to overcome the barriers of poor organization.
For
help in preparing course descriptions, syllabi and exams,
the following selections will be useful:
Bloom, Benjamin.Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I,
Cognitive Domain. Longmans, Green, 1956.
Diamond, Robert M. Designing and Assessing Course & Curricula:
A Practical Guide, rev.ed. Jossey Bass, 1998.
Strada, Michael J., “The Case for Sophisticated Course Syllabi,” To
Improve the Academy, vol. 19, Anker Publishing Co., Inc.,
2001.
© Larry M. Robbins, 2004